LMAO Germany 2014 would get ANNHILATED by Brazil 2002 and Italy 2006
but of course you're going to keep riding that nazi c0ck hard aren't you?
Anyone who genuinely believes that I am clueless is clueless themselves.
I'm probably the last person on here who refuses to debate - have you seen how many essay lengths discussions I have had with people?
Lol you call me clueless then label a World Cup winning team 'rubbish'. if you honestly think Italy were rubbish in that WC then you should give up football - they had a mix of underwhelming and excellent performances.
Let's be honest here - given my debate skills and the fact I've been right about many things, only a moron would think I'm clueless. What you've said says far more about you than it does me. I don't consider myself a football expert at all, but I clearly have more tactical and historical knowledge than a lot of people.
You really are a dummy. I was right about RM three years in a row - the law of averages said I would be right eventually. Football is fine margins - if Atletico had put a man on the post I'd have been proved right. besides, Ronaldo was useless in the final.
I never said Germany were the most overrated NT ever. I said they were overrated. You're creating a straw man to make the comment look worse. Plus you're too stupid to understand that a team can win a tournament and still be overrated. I said they won the tournament because there were no truly all-time great teams in the tournament, including themselves.
Tbh you have a clear vendetta against me - you attack me anonymously in all of my questions. You're obviously someone whom I have embarrassed before. The fact you're always anonymous also tells me you don't feel confident of outing yourself and going toe to toe with me.
There are plenty of people here who hate me and argue with me but aren't on block. I occasionally block idiots who lack debate skills though. You're obviously one of them as you DEFINITELY lack debate skills and are sore that I blocked you.
Also, you made the statement 'where was Di maria when kroos was winning the WC?" This is such a flawd argument (for reasons I pointed out) that I almost feel sorry for you in using it. You're clearly new to football.
Calling me a cowardly snake when you won't even come out of 'anon'? Now I know this is a pardoy account. Fvkc me your IQ must be in the double digits.
Er, where did I say Kroos was bad? I said he was quality but not as good as stated, and that he won't fit at RM due to certain weaknesses in his game. Either reading comprehension issues on your part or deliberate creation of a straw man argument. I'm inclined to think it's the latter as you're not cunning enough for the latter, but you're definitely stupid enough for the former.
Btw, a while back one of those 'best user' questions was created and most people named me at the top of it or near, so it's a safe bet that a lot of people disagree with you :)
I bet you're regretting this q now I have utterly and completely dismantled your nonsense. I could go on and on...I'm showing you mercy because I am tired. Now come out of anon ya cowardly loser...
"Brazil 2002 looked good by comparison because all the other teams at the time were weak. " The same is true of this WC ya moron. Holland looked average other than the Spain game yet made the semis being carried by Robben. Argentina were underwhelming for most of the competition yet still made the final. man you are a clown. Look at the state of the Brazil team that made the semis. Germany are overrated because there was no all-time great team to face them. Brazil 1982 were far better than Germany 14, but of course idiots like you would rate Germany higher because they won and Brazil 82 didn't.
After reading update 3 I actually feel sorry for you given how stupid you clearly are. I disliked Ronaldo as a player long before it was deemed 'cool' by some to do so. The comments in update 3 make sense in your tiny mind, but to anyone with any reasoning skills whatsoever your comments are a jumbled mess. You just sound like another Germany/Ronaldo sycophant. You're really this upset that I criticise Ronaldo? You fvcking arSee licking embarrassment. lol You're a fvcking advert for eugenics.
Btw, even some people here who adore Ronaldo as a player get on with me as a user. In your childish vernacular, "fail".
In response to the Spurs clown, Di Maria is playing with far lesser players, dummy. And he actually played pretty well yesterday (although stats fiends like you won't notice anything he did). Also, my comments on kroos aren't BECAUSE of these games - these games are simply what I expect of him based on my suspicions - it's not like I done a 180 on him based on these two games. Clearly you two are too stupid to understand that.
Also, Bale has been rubbish in his first two games of the season so if we were basing everything on two games (we're not, but bear with me if you can) then why should he be immune to the criticism that Kroos and Di maria aren't? Imbecile.
Christ, some of the people on here have zero debate skills whatsoever, and think of things in terms of absolutes. It's amazing that you two are even capable of turning on your computer. Thickos.
Anyone who gives this answer a TD - after the way I've pizzed all over you - has to be even dafter than you. Probably the Spurs clown or you with your multiple accounts, you sad sad act.
You may actually be that Blackburn fan, Chris.
Garrincha
"Germany are the most overrated NT ever" - Germany wins the WC months later.
"Real Madrid can't win big games because of Ronaldo" - Real Madrid wins the Champions League a few months later.
And whenever he can't win a debate or doesn't like an opinion he just blocks and acts like he "won"
Seriously what kind of cowardly snake is thi guy?
