because man city and psg use money that their owners have basically oil money. man utd spend money that they have earned from their success
It makes sense and is simple to understand
The FFP rules are perfectly correct, proper, and like it says in the title: FAIR.
Unlike the other two clubs that you have named (as well as others)
Manchester United generate sufficient profits, from legitimate football related business, to fund their transfer business.
That is equivalent to the constraints on any commercial enterprise.
What is considered to be UNFAIR .....
(by a consensus of most fans and bona-fide professional Association Football Clubs)
..... is when some filthy-rich sugar daddy buys a run-down club and ploughs endless personal wealth into buying football trophies, as a personal hobby, without any football business acumen.
Both Man City and PSG got in trouble because of it. However Man Utd have spent so much this summer and are okay. What the heck!? The rule is random, it doesn't make sense.
What are your thoughts on this?
