Unbiased answers please.....thanks :)
luke shaw...he has some much potential at a young age and plays like a modern full-back
I would probably rather have Luke Shaw on my team because he's more mobile and presents a threat in the attacking third. But no question Jon Flanagan is a far better defender than Shaw. So really it depends on whether you prefer a fullback to be solid going forward or rock solid at the back. But i'm going with Luke Shaw because he's starting caliber, Jon Flanagan is a reliable option from the bench.
Jon Flanagan. Luke Shaw has never played for a big club and has never played at top level.
Flanagan. Gets no praise or no hype because he plays for Liverpool. #FACT.
luke shaw
flanagan, i have my reasons
Both are sh*t
Who do you think is better...
Unbiased answers please.....thanks :)
